The time now is Thu Apr 25, 2024 10:58 am | Log in to check your private messages
View unanswered posts  Ghost forum archive
World of Ghosts - Paranormal Forums Forum IndexWorld of Ghosts - Paranormal Forums Forum Index
World of Ghosts Worldofghosts 24 hour chat room
                          Register


.............................
Post new topic   Reply to topic    World of Ghosts - Paranormal Forums Forum Index » General chat
View previous topic | View next topic  
Author Message
thecactus



Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 3196
Location: Northern Ireland

PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You have to learn to think 'outside the box' DB - IMO life after death will be proven in the future.
...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Back to top
D B Sweeney



Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 2842
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 10:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thecactus wrote:
You have to learn to think 'outside the box' DB - IMO life after death will be proven in the future.


How come all the people who have died and who said that when they're dead (such as Harry Houdini) they will 'come back' and prove that life after death is real - have not come back - just once?.

DB
...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Back to top
thecactus



Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 3196
Location: Northern Ireland

PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 11:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just because they haven't come back doesn't mean their spirit isn't still alive in another place, just not in this pyhsical world anymore. But again, if some did come back, which has been reported all over the world throughout history and the evidence is only anecdotal, you wouldn't consider it anyway.
...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Back to top
flossy
Moderator


Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 4921
Location: UK tyne/wear (geordie land)

PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

maybe there not aloud to come back Wink
...
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Back to top
thecactus



Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 3196
Location: Northern Ireland

PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 1:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's true flossy - there are rules that govern our world such as gravity, so there may well be certain rules in the next - and the ones that do somehow come back (ghosts) - well rules are made to be broken Wink
...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Back to top
Iain Lawrence



Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 419

PostPosted: Sun Aug 07, 2011 5:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It may indeed be a end of everything, but if it isn't I would like to think that I am inquisitive enough to attempt to solve the equation. DB you know that all science is no more than excepted theory and science doesn't have all the answers, which basicaly means anything is possible. But on one hand I tell myself to use common scence when considering these things, but on the other common scence who mean applying known variables and we are not in the known variable ball part here. We have to comprehend an equation and when it doesn't add up we have to consider other idealism in order to make the variables fit. Thats how science progress's. One day the situations we ponder will have more exeptable explanations and we will have advanced and adapted our rules, but till then, open minded analysis and comprehension is the order of the day.
...
View user's profile Send private message
Back to top
D B Sweeney



Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 2842
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 12:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Iain Lawrence wrote:
DB you know that all science is no more than excepted theory and science doesn't have all the answers, which basicaly means anything is possible.


This argument goes something like – as science cannot explain everything and does not have all the answers, it follows that:

Science is limited; and
other answers from other knowledge systems could be true (i.e., belief-systems and pseudoscience).
Or to put it another way, science is limited and those very limitations stop it from answering specific questions concerning certain issues. This is then typically used to gain leverage for claiming a ‘truth’ via these other knowledge systems (typically ones that don’t employ the principles of science). Common examples would be debates on psychic abilities, the existence of an after-life and the existence of apparitions from areas like parapsychology and popular science.

There are a number of reasons for why this argument is a falsehood. Firstly, science never claims to have all the answers – just a reliable and useful method for revealing them. So attacking science for not having all the answers is something of a straw-man argument in the first place (blaming science for not being able to do something – it never claimed to be able to do in the first place!). Secondly, the argument is based in the assumption that the limitations of science actually have any implications for what is being proposed. Although science is indeed limited, it does not automatically follow that these limitations have any implications for the existence of certain phenomena (i.e., of paranormal phenomena). The problem here relates to the idea that the limitations of science have any bearing whatsoever on the failure to find any evidence for, say, paranormal phenomena. However, if Extra-Sensory Perception (ESP) exists, a relatively simple science of mathematical probabilities, chance expectancies and well controlled experiments would be able to demonstrate its existence. The same would hold for other claimed abilities (mind reading, psycho-kinesis, mediumship, dowsing, remote viewing, etc). Science has had techniques and methodologies at its disposal for many years that are more than suitable to test and refute (or establish) such claims.

A relatively basic and simple well-controlled science would be more than sufficient to establish the truth of these claims. Thirdly, the limitations of one knowledge system do not, by default, add credence or support to any alternative. That is, although science may well be limited, this does not mean that alternative knowledge systems have any additional merits by default. For instance, gaps in knowledge from Astronomical science do not mean we should abandon it for Astrology. For Astrology to be a viable alternative it would need to demonstrate its own credentials for knowledge and understanding, independently of the limitations of any other system. The fact that science does not have all the answers, does not mean that pseudoscience has any answers at all (or is indeed capable of ever producing any)

DB Smile
...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Back to top
Iain Lawrence



Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 419

PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 3:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is indeed true to say that science can not explain many aspects of the paranormal world not because of its methology or ability, but known science cannot explore areas of interest of which it can not document. Within our investigations as you will by now have seen, we employ the use of scientific equipment to document and assess phenomenon and environments. The problem with such situations is that if we do document anything of which we can not explain, we have a very difficult problem in re-creating that situation in order to back up our findings. This is why we use meta-analysis, in order over time to come to a happy medium as does standard science. It is important though to note that I do not attack main stream science in any way, I sometimes become slightly defensive when heavly skeptical people attack sudo-sciences, simply because I am a strong believer that no stone should be unturned and all beliefs should be added into the situation of research. You will also have noticed that we do not use psychic mediums during events and only use what I refer too as base line equipment in order to document evidence. This removes the confusion from investigations and allows us to concentrate on the main and important aspects of documentable evidence. There are many thngs which science is striving to explain, the advancment of scientific equipment produces more tools in our tool kit. I have never made any conclusive points conserning any aspect of what we do, but there are always going to be people who are quick to judge and I suppose thats just part of the job. You though are open minded as well as skeptical which makes for a healthy mix. There are too many people in the paranormal world who arrogantly strut around telling people that what they beleive is real, that ghosts are everywhere and when we die we go to heaven. My concept of this is very different, you can see this if you read my BIG post lol. Even though these people associate with the paranormal world there concepts are fixed firmly in the atomic, they make reference to places and situations on the other side and yet have no real concept of energy or advanced theoretics or indeed the conection between the scientific world and the paranormal aspect, even though they use the word energy rather freely to explain the continued existance of interactive/armbient life after death. The world beyond the atomic as for as after death continuation is conserned I beleive as no baring upon anything we can comprehend due to everything we think and our entire imagination being a product of the atomic world. The ability to comprehend what we have not experienced is impossible. But hopefully by working together in all sciences and beliefs we can jointly begin and continue to attempt to contemplate the questions presented.
Thanks for that DB great conversation sir.
...
View user's profile Send private message
Back to top
D B Sweeney



Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 2842
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thecactus wrote:
Just because they haven't come back doesn't mean their spirit isn't still alive in another place, just not in this pyhsical world anymore. But again, if some did come back, which has been reported all over the world throughout history and the evidence is only anecdotal, you wouldn't consider it anyway.


Quite right Cactus but it also doesn't mean that their spirit isn't still alive in an empty shoe box under my bed Wink .

If spirits have been coming back since the dawn of history how come not a single one has not hung around long enough to be properly measured and tested?.

DB
...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Back to top
D B Sweeney



Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 2842
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

flossy wrote:
maybe there not aloud to come back Wink


Maybe they're chained to big bowls of ectoplasmic pasta as well Wink

DB
...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Back to top
Iain Lawrence



Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 419

PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe they are?
Maybe you're not telling us something.
...
View user's profile Send private message
Back to top
thecactus



Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 3196
Location: Northern Ireland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Iain Lawrence, I do like your outlook, and the fact that you never make any conclusive points etc... unlike others who claim it is all very black and white, although for example people who claim to be able to contact deceased - I guess they would have a black and white perception as they believe they know exactly what happens when we die; heaven, hell, ghosts etc... but the only problem then is, are they in fact communicating with the dead?

D B Sweeney, what did you say your opinion was of the Enfield Poltergeist case again?
...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Back to top
D B Sweeney



Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 2842
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Iain Lawrence wrote:
Maybe they are?
Maybe you're not telling us something.


Maybe you're right Wink

DB
...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Back to top
D B Sweeney



Joined: 27 Aug 2010
Posts: 2842
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

thecactus wrote:

D B Sweeney, what did you say your opinion was of the Enfield Poltergeist case again?


An interesting case, subject to a biased and flawed investigation that will remain inconclusive is my current opinion of the Enfield case.

Why do you ask my prickly friend?

DB
...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Back to top
thecactus



Joined: 07 Mar 2011
Posts: 3196
Location: Northern Ireland

PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

D B Sweeney, just your last point about no spirits sticking around long enough to be properly tested lol Laughing I remembered you saying Enfield could have been authentic - the old man talking through Janet for hours etc, false vocal cords etc

got to go now - back later Very Happy
...
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Back to top
Post new topic   Reply to topic    World of Ghosts - Paranormal Forums Forum Index » General chat
Display posts from previous:   
 
 
All times are GMT
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum