View previous topic | View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex
|
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex
|
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex
|
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex
|
|
... |
|
Back to top |
thecactus
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 3196 Location: Northern Ireland
|
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2011 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hold on Cactus i'm of out now but will have a look later on tonite. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
bitterbuck1 Moderator
Joined: 18 Nov 2006 Posts: 3963 Location: Arizona, USA
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2011 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If this craft came crashing down for space wouldn't it
have made a bigger impact site?
How it is positioned it looks as though it was
set in place.
|
|
... |
|
Back to top |
thecactus
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 3196 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2011 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bitterbuck1 wrote: |
If this craft came crashing down for space wouldn't it
have made a bigger impact site?
How it is positioned it looks as though it was
set in place.
|
Not necessarily; if these craft operate how they are reported to (eg Bob Lazar) then it probably didnt crash at a great speed - it probably just wobbled slowly to the ground. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
bitterbuck1 Moderator
Joined: 18 Nov 2006 Posts: 3963 Location: Arizona, USA
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2011 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thecactus wrote: | bitterbuck1 wrote: |
If this craft came crashing down for space wouldn't it
have made a bigger impact site?
How it is positioned it looks as though it was
set in place.
|
Not necessarily; if these craft operate how they are reported to (eg Bob Lazar) then it probably didnt crash at a great speed - it probably just wobbled slowly to the ground. |
Hmmmmm. Okey dokey. Still, it looks like it was set up. My opinion. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
thecactus
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 3196 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2011 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah it could well be; I have only seen this for the first time this evening so I don't know. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
D B Sweeney
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 Posts: 2842 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2011 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Heres a nice litle vid, love the way the military turn up.
IMO it's a light in the sky that could be anything from a plane to a helicopter to a lantern. When it's zoomed into, it goes out of focus so we can't see any real definition.
The plane shown later in the clip looks like a commercial airliner not a military jet and may not even have been filmed at the same time and in the same place as the unidentified light.
DB |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
thecactus
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 3196 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2011 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
D B Sweeney wrote: | Heres a nice litle vid, love the way the military turn up.
IMO it's a light in the sky that could be anything from a plane to a helicopter to a lantern. When it's zoomed into, it goes out of focus so we can't see any real definition.
The plane shown later in the clip looks like a commercial airliner not a military jet and may not even have been filmed at the same time and in the same place as the unidentified light.
DB |
Yes I agreed with one persons comment on that video:
That's definetly a civilian Boeing aircraft. The Sweden Air Force does not send low turbofan civilian airplanes to seek out a "strange light". They have interceptor jets to do that, every Air Force in the World have 24/7 stand-by aircraft, usually a pair ready to intercept and claim air superiority. INFORM YOURSELF. The light IS weird but not at all a "proof". You need to rely on OTHER sources. This proves nothing, and so many things out there that do prove something.
Having said that DB; a plane, lantern or helicopter? I don't think it was any of them. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2011 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting thoughts here...
Bitter, I can see broken tree branches and a bent over tree there and also cactus is righ it may have downed itself at a odd angle, remeber they us antigravity not lift so that would make the crash scene look different.
Cactus, I strongly disagrree with that debunker commenter, he obviously doesn't know his airliners because that is certenly not a boeing for passengers, the configuration doesn't fit any. Firstly it's wings are set too far forward to be a boeing, It's fuselage looks possibly big enough to be a 747 but I can't see the four engines on the wings either. Theres no markings visable and it looks like a military spy/observational plane of some sort, if they had one in the area that would have been the best choice to investigate.
They can reaserch and investigate in something like that and have large crews.
DB, the UFO seems to show an inteligence in it's maneuvers it is performing helicopter don't move that way atal, balloon again? Clever balloons.
It's a UFO for certen, and theres that notable movement I have seen first hand again. Thats why I posted it. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
bitterbuck1 Moderator
Joined: 18 Nov 2006 Posts: 3963 Location: Arizona, USA
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2011 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I Quote: | nteresting thoughts here...
Bitter, I can see broken tree branches and a bent over tree there and also cactus is righ it may have downed itself at a odd angle, remeber they us antigravity not lift so that would make the crash scene look different.
|
Is there any other information on this crash site?
|
|
... |
|
Back to top |
D B Sweeney
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 Posts: 2842 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
Posted: Sat May 21, 2011 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's a UFO for certen, and theres that notable movement I have seen first hand again. Thats why I posted it.
I agree.
DB |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
|