UFO's photographed over London?

D B Sweeney · Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 4:38 am Post subject: UFO's photographed over London?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/5007735/UFOs-photographed-over-London.html

See link for pic.

With thanks to Sarah Knapton of The Daily Telegraph

Derek Burdon was left stunned when he took a scenic picture of the UK capital then noticed four flying saucers on the far right of the picture.
Mr Burdon took the photographs 16 floors up on the roof top of Orion House in Covent Garden in the morning.
Although invisible to the naked eye, the shapes can be clearly seen on the picture.
Derek, 40, of Leverington, Cambs, said: "We couldn't believe it when we came to look at the photo. I just thought I would take some scenic shots of the London Eye and also Big Ben.
"There was nothing unusual in the photo and it was only when we flicked through them later that we saw them and then it started a big UFO debate.
"I have not tampered with it and you would not be able to fake it. It was taken on my mobile and I guess I am just lucky to have it. These shapes were not visible to the naked eye so it's not as if I was looking for them."

Weird? why didn't he see them - some kind of cloaking device? or is there a more plausible explanation?.

DB

flossy · Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 7:47 am Post subject:

they are pretty obvious in the piccy, how could he not see them with the naked eye Confused

maybe they are just clouds but look different when on film Confused

i dunno, scary thought though if we are being watched and cant see them Shocked

D B Sweeney · Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:04 am Post subject:

They certainly look like UFO's. Maybe the unique characteristics of the camera was able to see them - shutter speeds an' all that.
Are they monitoring our major cities - if so why?.
I don't think this is a fake.

DB

Agentscott · Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex

Wow and in the Telegraph too, many people are reporting things like this where the UFO's are not visible to the naked eye but they have a photograph, no idea why, I usually would say that if you can't see it then it's not there but i'm not so sure.

IO watched some footage( i will dig it out later) 2 girls from up north somewhere got and they are witnessing 3 orange orbs, the orbs are pulsating in the classic OBL type sighting, they reported that only 2 of the OBL's were visible to the naked eye, the camera definatly showes 3, very strange.

Perhaps this article is one of the techniques used to gradualy bring in information on ET's readying us for a dissclosure. We all know and trust a paper like that.
One other option is it is fake and more dissimformation but I don't think so here.

D B Sweeney · Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:55 am Post subject:

Good points Agentscott. While the Telegraph is one of the broadsheets it's journalists are only human and may be subject to the same errors that non journalists are subject to when it comes to evaluating a story that's supported by a picture.
When we take a picture we're often very 'focussed' on the subject matter - to the point of being unaware of anything else in the viewfinder.
Perhaps this another case of the drip feed that the worldwide media and the new world order are slowly giving us to acclimatise the world to the reality of the alien presence.

DB

Agentscott · Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex

If they are dissclosing I wish they would hurry up.
UFO's may not be normal ships, one idea is they could be some kind of animal or another idea is that they are advanced probes, unmaned.
More pics like that are needed in the mainstream.

D B Sweeney · Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:19 am Post subject:

More pics like that are needed in the mainstream.

Do you not think it might be a hoax, a camera anomaly or something other than alien spacecraft?.

DB

Agentscott · Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex

More UFO pics in general would be good and a decent report without the ridicule.
I don't know about that one as i have not seen it.
If the trusted newspapers print it I would say it has a pretty good chance of being at least a legitemate pic and not some one throwing a bannana in the air and snaping it. The question is, is it alien?

thecactus · Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 3196 Location: Northern Ireland

the reason they couldnt be seen with the naked eye could possibly be what bob lazar claimed - he claimed any UFO that operated the same way as the one he worked on, wouldnt be visible from underneath due to the fact that they have a gravity propulsion system, which distorts time and space

Agentscott · Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex

Well remember Cactus,
To be honest they do remind me of the enhancments of the Jerusulem UFO.
One thing for sure, they don't look like a dust anomaly like orbs.

D B Sweeney · Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 12:11 am Post subject:

The question is, is it alien?

Exactly Wink

How readily are we prepared to accept that these are alien spacecraft based on a single pic?.

DB

flossy · Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:40 am Post subject:

they could just be breaks in the clouds and the sun shineing through, i went out yday and was looking at the sky and i saw something very simular to whats in that picture Wink

im not convinced they are ufo's

D B Sweeney · Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:47 am Post subject:

flossy · Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:58 am Post subject:

there would be major panic if everyone did that lol

thecactus · Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 3196 Location: Northern Ireland

flossy, no they definately dont look like breaks in the cloud to me - there are no rays that i can see

Agentscott, i wonder why there are a lot of good sightings over cities?