View previous topic | View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Opps I guess I had Aiden on the brain(must have been all that flashing ice cream), I ment Carlos, changed it now. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
thecactus
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 3196 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
yeah I hate that avatar lol - its so random; not like a headbanging hitler |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2011 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes a far more refined choice!
Personally I would prefer a nice flash little self desinged alien logo.
Yes I nicked the desing from a crop circle and crossed it with an old bottle of Pepsi and hey presto.
I used it on my Youtube in it's original colors, yellow was the crops and also this symbol appears on the rendelsham landed ship reported by the security peresonel.
At least they won't be doing me for copyright issues, I stole it of aliens. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
carlos2010
Joined: 23 Oct 2010 Posts: 288
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Agentscott wrote: | Very funny Carlos but are you forgeting the nuclear airbase in that area?
Are you forgeting the compeling evidence including accounts from respected milatary personel, multiple witnesses...the list goes on.
ET's may well be very interested in that area, here mainly because of the base, the missles were shut down but also woods are great places for hidding and lossing people and not to mention interesting landscape. Lots of animals to see and take and we know they are at that.
If you was at a alien world, I don't suppose you would be to up on the local tourist hotspots and so could end up landing at the most random part of it accidently. Aliens are alien to our world so all of this planet would be of interest to them. I would enjoy seeing anypart of an alien world. |
T'was a mere joke, but yes, you are right, they may well be interested in the nuclear capabilities of this little ball in the vastness of space, maybe comparing how our technologies differ? |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thats a very interesting thery there Carlos.
I think they shut us down though so perhaps they are not impressed by using science/technology for war.
They proboblyy don't want us blowing ourselves up for their own reasons, hope there good!
Some say it was the first nullear detonation that drew their attention to us in the first place. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
thecactus
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 3196 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Wed May 11, 2011 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
yes I heard that too - the amount of UFO sightings skyrocketed since WW2, possibily due to the creation (and use on civilian cities) of the atomic bomb and eventually nuclear warheads - basically humans reached the stage were they could totally destroy ourselves so it makes sense that would draw their attention |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 5:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yep, nulear tech is potentually enough to wipe us of the planet, it sounds so dodgy when you think of it using that power on our own home, like seting of a grenade in a greenhouse.
I always wonder why they made them because a explosion like that is bad for the whole world so actually shoting our own foot off.
I beleive the he aliens may not be talking to us...they left a clue by disarming our rockets and leaving. The message is clear, They won't talk to us unless we put down our weopons.
Rightly so too.
If the whole world dissarmed and used the tech for a more usefull use the I bet they would be more ready to talk to us. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
D B Sweeney
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 Posts: 2842 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are you forgeting the compeling evidence including accounts from respected milatary personel, multiple witnesses...the list goes on.
What 'compelling evidence'????. Respected Military personnel - who?. What multiple witnesses?. All these have been researched to death and doubts cast on the reliability of their reports and their motives (post event) for reporting them.
If you could just list a few 'compelling evidences' then that would be a start.
Ta
DB |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
The evedence denyed...
imprints left in the ground at rendelsham, lights seen by multiple witness, Cows taken after lights being seen, it's all there.
Loads of military personell, the entire project disclosure.
Bob lazar.
Each time a report is read in the papers, it seems to be ridiculed and left wide open with no real answers and a sudden loss nof interest in commenting.
Page one....then page seven at the bottom.
More evidence...
Scorch marks left in corn anlong with radiation.
crop circle patterns. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
D B Sweeney
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 Posts: 2842 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2011 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
What evidence is there for cows being taken?. Can you supply a link?.
What's Bob Lazar got to do with Rendlesham?. What's scorch marks in corn got to do with Rendlesham?. Please supply links that support your increasingly random unrelated claims.
DB |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Agentscott
Joined: 08 Feb 2011 Posts: 1042 Location: Essex
|
Posted: Sun May 15, 2011 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't mean cows from rendelsham, I was just giving other realated evedence too.
If you think there is nothing to rendelsham then you are very wrong and need to go over it again.
Rendelsham had evedence thats denyed that I already said and you just denyed too.
I can get the names if you really want and go over it all again, there was witnesses, someone even touched the dam thing, it left marks in the ground, radiation levels were high and there was tree branches that were broken.
I have already supplied a link to mutilations but if you really want I can easilly find some more. Remeber the Sussex case?
Your claims to science being the one and only are so wrong DB, they really did a good job on you. You have been duped into beleiving in only science and they have spoon feed you what you can and can't beleive.
You've been going on again about evedence and science being the one and only but it doesn't seem to wash witha anybody. Wheres your Bin laden evedence? bet you feel for that one too. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
thecactus
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 3196 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: |
Your claims to science being the one and only are so wrong DB, they really did a good job on you. You have been duped into beleiving in only science and they have spoon feed you what you can and can't beleive.
|
Yes but that is his belief, and I understand that, but I too think there is a lot more than just science, plus our science is still very primitive |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
D B Sweeney
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 Posts: 2842 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 5:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
I can get the names if you really want and go over it all again, there was witnesses, someone even touched the dam thing, it left marks in the ground, radiation levels were high and there was tree branches that were broken.
No need Agentscott. I know the Rendlesham case inside out. Jim Pennistons claim that he touched the craft is unsupportable and veridically useless. The marks on the ground had far more rational explanations as did the 'high' radiation levels and tree branches being broken - you show me an area of forest that doesn't have broken branches in the canopy.
You're obviously getting all your info from UFO websites that have decided this is the UK Roswell Agentscott - have you actually read a book on Rendlesham or is it all off the internet in easily digestible soundbites?.
DB |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
D B Sweeney
Joined: 27 Aug 2010 Posts: 2842 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes but that is his belief, and I understand that, but I too think there is a lot more than just science, plus our science is still very primitive
Thankyou Cactus
Science doesn't know everything and I've no doubt it still has a lot of discoveries to make but we can only go off what we know science knows - not speculation and 'what ifs' without any supporting hypotheses backed by some evidence.
DB |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
thecactus
Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 3196 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
you see Im not all bad
But it is generally accepted by most scientists that there must be other intelligent life in the universe (millions of intelligent alien races) so it is very possible that at least one of them has advanced their knowledge further than we are capable of understanding and visited us, and one of the instances was Rendlesham. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
|