Pentagon not hit by an airplane

koala · Site Admin Joined: 12 Oct 2006 Posts: 712

http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2003130805488275653

http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2004048893667541787

Claims that the Pentagon was hit by something significantly smaller than a Boeing 757 (typically a missile or smaller aircraft) have been raised by some conspiracy theorists based on photographs in which there appears to be a lack of expected debris or pieces of a commercial aircraft within the immediate impact area, and what some believe is a lack of damage to the building and the lawn. One of the first proponents of this conspiracy theory was Thierry Meyssan in his book 9/11: The Big Lie, the idea was also advanced by the website Hunt the Boeing! and the popular internet video Loose Change. A likely cause of these ideas was the initial scarcity of documentation of the attack. At first the only evidence available consisted of long distance photographs and video footage taken after the attack, eyewitness testimony from individuals at the scene, and five video frames captured by a security camera which were released on March 8, 2002. A large amount of evidence was later released after the Zacarias Moussaoui trial and several Freedom of Information Act requests.

Suspicions were additionally fueled by a lack of video footage of the impact of the jetliner, since many assume that the Pentagon must be subject to intense camera surveillance for security reasons. In addition to the Pentagon's own security cameras, these people also noted that security camera footage from a nearby Citgo gas station and from the Virginia Department of Transportation was confiscated by the US government. On May 16, 2006 the security camera footage was released as part of a Judicial Watch's FOIA request. However, due to a low number of frames per second, the videos do not clearly show the impact of the plane, only the approach of the plane (at an angle) and the explosion cloud, thus keeping the "no Boeing" theory popular. In addition to the security cam footage, the Citgo footage was released on 15 September 2006, but did not show the attacks. The FBI is to release the Doubletree Hotel by November 9, 2006. Others are trying to obtain the over eighty other tapes confiscated in the Pentagon area after the attacks.

The Pentagon "no Boeing" theory constitutes a controversial issue, even among conspiracy theorists. Several researchers have shown that the wings would cause less damage than the plane's main body, that photographs of large amounts of wreckage and debris matching a 757 have become available, that the appearance of the size of the hole is typically misrepresented; and that the actual fuselage diameter of 12 feet is a much more relevant dimension for the deepest parts of the hole than the overall 44 foot height of the 757's tail. Purdue University also released a study with results that recreated the attack. According to Purdue, the plane was like a "sausage skin" because of the speed of impact. Moreover, hundreds of eyewitnesses who saw the aircraft close up as it approached the Pentagon describe it as an American Airlines Boeing 757.

Aiden · Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 244

It's under an invisible dome. True in my words!

twinks · Joined: 23 Jan 2009 Posts: 229 Location: rugby

god how i hate conspiracy theries. sooo annoying. we will never know the truth ever. so frustrating. Rolling Eyes

Aiden · Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 244

That's why they call it a conspiracy. I'm not afraid of the next conspiracy, but I know it will be violent!

Can't people understand?! This is not the end! More violence and threats will happen!

twinks · Joined: 23 Jan 2009 Posts: 229 Location: rugby

we are all doomed

Aiden · Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 244

Yes! So save all your toys, cause a charity toy-drive is in the works, when more people die from an attack! Twisted Evil

ClaraJayne · Joined: 21 Jul 2010 Posts: 54 Location: Burntwood, UK

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_9TzKDyMps&videos=GKAqe5NIPFY you will find this very interesting!