View previous topic | View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Sharla Tann

Joined: 03 Dec 2011 Posts: 161
|
Posted: Sun Mar 03, 2013 8:20 pm Post subject: Opinions on dashcam 'ghost' footage? |
|
|
I'm not saying this is the smoking gun, but it's a hard one to debunk.
It's only a matter of time...
(Video will jump to about 3 seconds before apparition) |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
neil45
Joined: 27 Nov 2012 Posts: 61 Location: Brechin, scotland
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 2:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ahhhhhh hard to debunk eh?
Look at what you have said on my Sighting on A90!
That is very very similar to what I saw, same density, same colour, and exactly near enough same movement.
At last a debate, something that seems rare on here.
Look at my post again, and look at the reasons you and everyone else gave to DEBUNK it. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Sharla Tann

Joined: 03 Dec 2011 Posts: 161
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
neil45 wrote: |
Look at my post again, and look at the reasons you and everyone else gave to DEBUNK it. |
I have just reviewed all my posts in your thread, although the lack of commitment to the original post is open to question.
What on my part do you interpret as debunking? |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
neil45
Joined: 27 Nov 2012 Posts: 61 Location: Brechin, scotland
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
You are obviously thick, hence the blonde avatar.
What is seen in that video is near identical to what I saw and described.
You poured scorn on my experience, yet you cannot debunk that video. Is that because you happen to have posted it?
In your video, as the apparition starts to disappear it looks like it walks through a door frame. As it vanishes you can see the straight vertical line it goes behind.
Difference is, mine did not vanish behind a near invisible door frame, it evaporated.
You had a good go at derailing my story, yet yours apparently is absolutely amazing, and hard to debunk, as you put it.
As I said you are obviously, thick, or full of yourself.
I suggest its both.
CUE DB |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
neil45
Joined: 27 Nov 2012 Posts: 61 Location: Brechin, scotland
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's how most of the light is directed, however a small amount is diffused over practically 180 degrees, so there's still an element of doubt.
As someone quite rightly pointed out on here recently, it's only a matter of time before vehicles are fitted as standard with forward-facing cameras. If those cameras are capable of recording the phenomena witnessed by drivers, then we'll really have something to discuss.
Above was your last post in my thread.
So again what makes yours so convincing you CANT debunk it ???? your an arsehole |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
neil45
Joined: 27 Nov 2012 Posts: 61 Location: Brechin, scotland
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ten we will really have something to discuss was your last line.
So on that basis, your thread is bollox |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
thecactus

Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 3197 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
It is one of the more interesting pieces of footage I have seen. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
GavKnight

Joined: 23 Jun 2009 Posts: 112 Location: Ollerton, Notts
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
not so sure about that, there seems to be some sort of shadow that it walks behind/into where the cars headlights should have been shining on that particular area,,,,,it doesn't quite add up |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Sharla Tann

Joined: 03 Dec 2011 Posts: 161
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GavKnight wrote: | not so sure about that, there seems to be some sort of shadow that it walks behind/into where the cars headlights should have been shining on that particular area |
You can't rule-out the possibility that the dark area is in itself part of the apparition, from which there need not be necessarily a visible reflection.
If an apparition can reflect visible light, part of it may be equally capable of absorbing it. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
Sharla Tann

Joined: 03 Dec 2011 Posts: 161
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
neil45 wrote: | You are obviously thick, hence the blonde avatar. |
If that's the depth of your reasoning then I'm afraid you have no credibility.
Quote: |
What is seen in that video is near identical to what I saw and described. | If you say so. Quote: |
You poured scorn on my experience, yet you cannot debunk that video. Is that because you happen to have posted it? | I did not 'pour scorn' on your experience, I just asked for clarification and made observations. If you expect more from a verbal report then you're being hopelessly unrealistic.
It should be blatantly obvious to anyone that that video is nothing to do with me.
Quote: |
In your video, as the apparition starts to disappear it looks like it walks through a door frame. As it vanishes you can see the straight vertical line it goes behind. | I have addressed that issue elsewhere.
Quote: | Above was your last post in my thread.
So again what makes yours so convincing you CANT debunk it ???? | The trivial fact that it's on video rather than in your memory.
You're demonstrably illiterate, which is undoubtedly why you're a professional driver. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
D B Sweeney

Joined: 27 Aug 2010 Posts: 2842 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Very poor IMO. For a start there's not enough supporting info ie: who shot it, where and when plus it's atrocious quality means very little can be gleaned from it other than a figure walks across a road and appears to vanish (which could be a glitch of the image processing anyway).
Hardly a smoking gun Sharla....
DB |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
neil45
Joined: 27 Nov 2012 Posts: 61 Location: Brechin, scotland
|
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you say so.
Snarl a tann.
That quip above is what you replied to me when I said what is in your easily debunkable video is what I described in my post.
Not only was my post describing along the same lines as what is in that video, but I also posted it a few months before you posted your youtube video.
So, as I have asked your air headed self before, why dismiss my encounter out of hand, which you have, its on the thread for all to see, yet your uncannily resembling video, is "hard to debunk" in your own words.
The only thing that is hard to debunk is that fact you weren't born such an arsehole. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
neil45
Joined: 27 Nov 2012 Posts: 61 Location: Brechin, scotland
|
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
GavKnight wrote: | not so sure about that, there seems to be some sort of shadow that it walks behind/into where the cars headlights should have been shining on that particular area,,,,,it doesn't quite add up |
You are spot on, anyone with a brain can see it walks from right to left and seems to walk into a block, looking like a blacked out door frame.
Unfortunately Snarla could not see that, as IT has its sight impaired by the bollocks hanging down in front of ITS eyes, which are in fact attached to the cock on ITS head. |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
flossy Moderator

Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 4924 Location: UK tyne/wear (geordie land)
|
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
neil, i get that you dont aggree with sharla's video or the comments that were made on your post from sharla
but can you please refrain from the petty name calling please
all the threads are up for debate on here and you have to take the good with the bad with out the insulting name calling, its un called for and very childish |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
thecactus

Joined: 07 Mar 2011 Posts: 3197 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2013 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Was the footage captured in 2001 or is the date wrong, does anyone know? |
|
... |
|
Back to top |
|